WELCOME
Thanks for coming to visit my website. I write about science, technology, foreign affairs, and other subjects.
Follow me on Twitter: @kkakaesnavigation
-
Drones and Aerial Observation
The Pioneer Detectives
I published a short book with The Millions.
It's the story of the Pioneer Anomaly, a long-standing mystery. The book is short and fun—the length of a novella—but also, in the words of Amazon's reviewer, "powerful and sad". If you've got any curiosity about how NASA works behind the scenes or why scientists believe what they do, I think you'll enjoy the book.
It is available on Amazon as a Kindle Single and also on Apple's iBooks.Drone Wars
Archives by Date
clips by publication
- The American Prospect
- Aviation Week & Space Technology
- Columbia Journalism Review
- CNN.com
- The Economist
- Foreign Policy
- Huffington Post
- MIT Technology Review
- NPR
- POLITICO
- Popular Science
- Primer Stories
- Quartz
- Quanta Magazine
- Slate
- The Wall Street Journal
- Washington Post
- Vox
- Zocalo Public Square
- The Millions
- The Weekly Wonk
- Discover
- CQ Global Researcher
- Inside Mexico
- Stanford Magazine
- Poder
John Engler
What Engler missed
1 March 2011
So I’m at a conference on the future of energy, and John Engler, president of the Business Roundtable and former governor of Michigan, was talking. He was speaking about the need for better education and a better workforce when he said the following:
“Sometimes if you’re going to go from laboratory to commercial, who are the technical people who are going to work in that high tech environment with the proper controls–the right statistical and analytical ability to make sure this is not, uh, you know, reducing errors, this is zero error, zero tolerance for error, manufacturing has to get it right and that takes skilled people.”
Now, “technical people” with the right “statistical and analytical ability” would know that aiming for zero error in a manufacturing process is a very silly and costly thing to do. At some point, catching the marginal error is going to take more effort than it is worth, in time and money. It doesn’t take super-advanced training in probability theory to see this. Making a mistake like this in quite literally in the same breath as calling for better education I suppose proves his point, but not in the way Engler intended.
weblog
tags: John Engler, Statistics